Brannon & Brannon - Fort Walton Beach personal injury attorney
Call For A Free Consultation With Local Attorneys

Surveillance Of A Plaintiff

In Hankerson v. Wiley, 154 So. 3d 511 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), the trial court allowed the plaintiff to see a surveillance video taken of him post-accident before his deposition. The defendant appealed the ruling. The Fourth District of Appeal agreed with the defendant, finding that the trial court abused its authority when it permitted a plaintiff to view a post-accident surveillance video before allowing a defendant to depose the plaintiff. The basis of the ruling was “because the benefit of the surveillance video may be irreparably lost if the plaintiff is permitted to view [it] before [the defendant] has an opportunity to question her, irreparable harm …has been shown”

So what does that mean to our clients? A defendant can use surveillance materials to question our client’s claim in their deposition by allowing the defendant to depose the video-taped plaintiff after the video has been taken but before its contents are viewed by our client or by our office.

To read the full opinion, click here: 



FindLaw Network
atto image

Father And Son Team Working Together To Serve Our Clients

Our legal team consists of attorney Wm. Dennis Brannon and his son C. Paul Brannon. We work together as a father and son team to provide our clients with exceptional service and solutions in motor vehicle accident claims and other personal injury matters.
Contact Us Today
atto image
AV Preeminent | Judical Edition
Judical Edition| AV Preeminent 2018| Wm. Dennis Brannon| Highest Possible Rating in Both Legal Ability and Ethical Standards Reflecting the confidential opinions of members of the Bar and Judiciary
Wm. Dennis Brannon | Highest Possible Peer Review Rating In Legal Ability & Ethical Standards

We Handle Cases on a Contingency Fee Basis
Tell Us About Your Case - Free Consultations